599,99 zł
Written with both postgraduate students and researchers in academia and industry in mind, this reference covers the chemistry behind Metal Nanopowders, including production, characterization, oxidation and combustion. The contributions from renowned international scientists working in the field detail applications in technologies, scale-up processes and safety aspects surrounding their handling and storage.
Ebooka przeczytasz w aplikacjach Legimi na:
Liczba stron: 767
Cover
Related Titles
Title Page
Copyright
Foreword
List of Contributors
Introduction
Chapter 1: Estimation of Thermodynamic Data of Metallic Nanoparticles Based on Bulk Values
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Thermodynamic Background
1.3 Size-Dependent Materials Data of Nanoparticles
1.4 Comparison of Experimental and Calculated Melting Temperatures
1.5 Comparison with Data for the Entropy of Melting
1.6 Discussion of the Results
1.7 Conclusions
1.A Appendix: Zeros and Extrema of the Free Enthalpy of Melting
Chapter 2: Numerical Simulation of Individual Metallic Nanoparticles
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Molecular Dynamics Simulation
2.3 Size-Dependent Properties
2.4 Sintering Study of Two Nanoparticles
2.5 Oxidation of Nanoparticles in the Presence of Oxygen
2.6 Heating and Cooling of a Core–Shell Structured Particle
2.7 Chapter Summary
Chapter 3: Electroexplosive Nanometals
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Electrical Explosion of Wires Technology for Nanometals Production
3.3 Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Chapter 4: Metal Nanopowders Production
4.1 Introduction
4.2 EEW Method of Nanopowder Production
4.3 Recondensation NP-Producing Methods: Plasma-Based Technology
4.4 Characteristics of Al Nanopowders
4.5 Nanopowder Chemical Passivation
4.6 Microencapsulation of Al Nanoparticles
4.7 The Process of Producing Nanopowders of Aluminum by Plasma-Based Technology
Chapter 5: Characterization of Metallic Nanoparticle Agglomerates
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Description of the Structure of Nanoparticle Agglomerates
5.3 Experimental Techniques to Characterize the Agglomerate Structure
5.4 Mechanical Stability
5.5 Thermal Stability
5.6 Rate-Limiting Steps: Gas Transport versus Reaction Velocity
5.7 Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Chapter 6: Passivation of Metal Nanopowders
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Theoretical and Experimental Background
6.3 Characteristics of Passivated Particles
6.4 Conclusion
Acknowledgment
Chapter 7: Safety Aspects of Metal Nanopowders
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Some Basic Phenomena of Oxidation of Nanometal Particles in Air
7.3 Determination of Fire Hazards of Nanopowders
7.4 Sensitivity against Electrostatic Discharge
7.5 Ranking of Nanopowders According to Hazard Classification
7.6 Demands for Packing
Chapter 8: Reaction of Aluminum Powders with Liquid Water and Steam
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Experimental Technique for Studying Reaction Al Powders with Liquid and Gaseous Water
8.3 Oxidation of Aluminum Powder in Water Vapor Flow
8.4 Nanopowders Passivated with Coatings on the Base of Aluminum Carbide
8.5 Study of Al Powder/H
2
O Slurry Samples Heated Linear in “Open System” by STA
8.6 Ultrasound (US) and Chemical Activation of Metal Aluminum Oxidation in Liquid Water
8.7 Conclusion
Acknowledgments
Chapter 9: Nanosized Cobalt Catalysts for Hydrogen Storage Systems Based on Ammonia Borane and Sodium Borohydride
9.1 Introduction
9.2 A Study of Nanosized Cobalt Borides by Physicochemical Methods
9.3 Conclusions
Acknowledgment
Chapter 10: Reactive and Metastable Nanomaterials Prepared by Mechanical Milling
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Mechanical Milling Equipment
10.3 Process Parameters
10.4 Material Characterization
10.5 Ignition and Combustion Experiments
10.6 Starting Materials
10.7 Mechanically Alloyed and Metal–Metal Composite Powders
10.8 Reactive Nanocomposite Powders
10.9 Conclusions
Chapter 11: Characterizing Metal Particle Combustion In Situ: Non-equilibrium Diagnostics
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Ignition and Combustion of Solid Materials
11.3 Aluminum Reaction Mechanisms
11.4 The Flame Tube
11.5 Flame Temperature
11.6 Conclusions
Acknowledgment
Chapter 12: Characterization and Combustion of Aluminum Nanopowders in Energetic Systems
12.1 Fuels in Energetic Systems: Introduction and Literature Survey
12.2 Thermochemical Performance of Energetic Additives
12.4 Mechanical and Rheological Behavior with Nanopowders
Index
End User License Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
58
57
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
187
188
186
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
359
358
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
Table of Contents
Figure 1.1
Figure 1.2
Figure 1.3
Figure 1.4
Figure 1.5
Figure 1.6
Figure 1.7
Figure 1.8
Figure 1.9
Figure 1.10
Figure 1.11
Figure 2.1
Figure 2.2
Figure 2.3
Figure 2.4
Figure 2.5
Figure 2.6
Figure 2.7
Figure 2.8
Figure 2.9
Figure 2.10
Figure 2.11
Figure 2.12
Figure 2.13
Figure 2.14
Figure 2.15
Figure 2.16
Figure 2.17
Figure 2.18
Figure 2.19
Figure 2.20
Figure 2.21
Figure 2.22
Figure 2.23
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.3
Figure 3.4
Figure 3.5
Figure 3.6
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.3
Figure 4.4
Figure 4.5
Figure 4.6
Figure 4.7
Figure 4.8
Figure 4.9
Figure 4.10
Figure 4.11
Figure 4.12
Figure 4.13
Figure 4.14
Figure 4.15
Figure 4.16
Figure 4.17
Figure 5.1
Figure 5.2
Figure 5.3
Figure 5.4
Figure 5.5
Figure 5.6
Figure 5.7
Figure 5.8
Figure 5.9
Figure 5.10
Figure 5.11
Figure 5.12
Figure 5.13
Figure 5.14
Figure 6.1
Figure 6.2
Figure 6.3
Figure 6.4
Figure 6.5
Figure 6.6
Figure 6.7
Figure 6.8
Figure 6.9
Figure 7.1
Figure 7.2
Figure 7.3
Figure 7.4
Figure 7.5
Figure 8.1
Figure 8.2
Figure 8.3
Figure 8.4
Figure 8.5
Figure 8.6
Figure 8.7
Figure 8.8
Figure 8.9
Figure 8.10
Figure 8.11
Figure 8.12
Figure 8.13
Figure 8.14
Figure 8.15
Figure 8.16
Figure 8.17
Figure 8.18
Figure 8.19
Figure 8.20
Figure 8.21
Figure 8.22
Figure 8.23
Figure 8.24
Figure 8.25
Figure 8.26
Figure 8.27
Figure 8.28
Figure 8.29
Figure 8.30
Figure 8.31
Figure 9.1
Figure 9.2
Figure 9.3
Figure 9.4
Figure 9.5
Figure 9.6
Figure 9.7
Figure 9.8
Figure 9.9
Figure 9.10
Figure 9.11
Figure 9.12
Figure 9.13
Figure 9.14
Figure 9.15
Figure 9.16
Figure 9.17
Figure 9.18
Figure 10.1
Figure 10.2
Figure 10.3
Figure 10.4
Figure 10.5
Figure 10.6
Figure 10.7
Figure 10.8
Figure 10.9
Figure 10.10
Figure 10.11
Figure 10.12
Figure 10.13
Figure 10.14
Figure 10.15
Figure 10.16
Figure 10.17
Figure 10.18
Figure 10.19
Figure 10.20
Figure 10.21
Figure 10.22
Figure 10.23
Figure 10.24
Figure 10.25
Figure 10.26
Figure 10.27
Figure 10.28
Figure 10.29
Figure 10.30
Figure 10.31
Figure 10.32
Figure 10.33
Figure 10.34
Figure 10.35
Figure 10.36
Figure 10.37
Figure 10.38
Figure 10.39
Figure 10.40
Figure 10.41
Figure 10.42
Figure 10.43
Figure 10.44
Figure 10.45
Figure 10.46
Figure 10.47
Figure 11.1
Figure 11.2
Figure 11.3
Figure 11.4
Figure 11.5
Figure 11.6
Figure 11.7
Figure 12.1
Figure 12.2
Figure 12.3
Figure 12.4
Figure 12.5
Figure 12.10
Figure 12.11
Figure 12.12
Figure 12.13
Figure 12.14
Figure 12.15
Figure 12.16
Figure 12.17
Figure 12.18
Figure 12.19
Figure 12.20
Figure 12.21
Figure 12.22
Figure 12.23
Figure 12.24
Figure 12.25
Figure 12.26
Figure 12.27
Figure 12.28
Figure 12.29
Figure 12.30
Figure 12.31
Figure 12.32
Figure 12.33
Figure 12.34
Figure 12.35
Table 1.1
Table 2.1
Table 2.2
Table 2.3
Table 2.4
Table 2.5
Table 3.1
Table 4.1
Table 6.2
Table 6.3
Table 6.4
Table 6.5
Table 6.6
Table 6.7
Table 6.8
Table 6.9
Table 7.1
Table 7.2
Table 7.3
Table 7.4
Table 7.5
Table 8.1
Table 8.2
Table 9.1
Table 9.2
Table 9.3
Table 9.4
Table 9.5
Table 10.1
Table 11.1
Table 12.1
Table 12.2
Table 12.3
Table 12.4
Table 12.5
Table 12.6
Table 12.7
Table 12.8
Table 12.10
Table 12.12
Table 12.13
Table 12.14
Table 12.15
Table 12.16
Table 12.17
Table 12.18
Table 12.19
Koch, E.
Metal-Fluorocarbon Based Energetic Materials
2012
ISBN: 978-3-527-32920-5 (Also available in digital formats)
Agrawal, J.P.
High Energy Materials
Propellants, Explosives and Pyrotechnics
2010
ISBN: 978-3-527-32610-5 (Also available in digital formats)
Tjong, S.C.
Polymer Composites with Carbonaceous Nanofillers
Properties and Applications
2012
ISBN: 978-3-527-41080-4 (Also available in digital formats)
Teipel, U. (ed.)
Energetic Materials
Particle Processing and Characterization
2005
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-30240-6 (Also available in digital formats)
Edited by
Alexander Gromov and Ulrich Teipel
The Editors
Prof. Dr. Alexander Gromov
Tomsk Polytechnic University
30 Lenin Prospekt
634050 Tomsk
Russia
and
Technical University Nürnberg
Georg-Simon-Ohm
Process Engineering Department
Wassertorstr. 10
90489 Nürnberg
Germany
Prof. Dr. Ulrich Teipel
Technical University Nürnberg
Georg-Simon-Ohm
Process Engineering Department
Wassertorstr. 10
90489 Nürnberg
Germany
All books published by Wiley-VCH are carefully produced. Nevertheless, authors, editors, and publisher do not warrant the information contained in these books, including this book, to be free of errors. Readers are advised to keep in mind that statements, data, illustrations, procedural details or other items may inadvertently be inaccurate.
Library of Congress Card No.: applied for
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.
Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek
The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are \hbox{available} on the Internet at <http://dnb.d-nb.de>.
© 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Boschstr. 12, 69469 Weinheim, Germany
All rights reserved (including those of translation into other languages). No part of this book may be reproduced in any form – by photoprinting, microfilm, or any other means – nor transmitted or translated into a machine language without written permission from the publishers. Registered names, trademarks, etc. used in this book, even when not specifically marked as such, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
Print ISBN: 978-3-527-33361-5
ePDF ISBN: 978-3-527-68072-6
ePub ISBN: 978-3-527-68071-9
mobi ISBN: 978-3-527-68070-2
oBook ISBN: 978-3-527-68069-6
Interest in studying the combustion of metal powders dramatically raised since Russian scientists Kondratyuk and Tsander suggested the use of metals as energetic additives to rocket fuels at the beginning of the twentieth century. Since that time, it is obvious that an increase in the dispersion of flammable substances participating in heterogeneous combustion processes leads to an increase in rate and heat of combustion. The major energy contribution belongs to the process of oxidation, which is also bound up with powder dispersion and purity. Burning of metal nanopowders is accompanied by new physical and chemical laws (such as high reactivity under heating, threshold phenomena, formation of nitrides in air), which allow to fully appreciate the advantages and disadvantages of nanopowders when used in fuel systems.
Widespread use of metal nanopowders is currently hampered by the lack of enough advanced technology for their preparation, certification, and standardization procedures, instability during storage, and subjective factors: the possible toxicity of nanopowders, investment risks, cost of nanotechnologies, and so on. Therefore, the main objective for the authors is to inform a wide readership of fundamental and applied studies on the processes of oxidation and combustion of metal nanopowders.
Prof. Dr.-Ing. George Manelis, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Hiltmar Schubert,Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics
,
Fraunhofer Institute of
Russian Academy of Science, Chernogolovka, Chemical Technology,
RussiaPfinztal, Germany
List of Contributors
Giovanni Colombo
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Luigi T. De Luca
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Stefano Dossi
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Edward L. Dreizin
University Heights
Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological, and Pharmaceutical Engineering
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Warren St
Newark
NJ 07102-1982
USA
N. Eisenreich
Institute of Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies
Russian Academy of Science
Socialisticheskaya str., 1
Byisk
Russia
Cory Farley
Texas Tech University
Mechanical Engineering Department
Corner of 7th and Boston Ave.
Lubbock
TX 79409-1021
USA
Marco Fassina
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Franz Dieter Fischer
Montanuniversität Leoben
Institute of Mechanics
Franz-Josef-Straße 18
A-8700 Leoben
Austria
Luciano Galfetti
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Alexander Gromov
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Lenin prospekt, 30
Tomsk
Russia
and
George Simon Ohm University of Applied Sciences
Processing Department
Wassertorstr 10
Nürnberg
Germany
Sh. Guseinov
State Research institute for Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds (GNIIChTEOS)
Shosse Entuziastov str., 38
Moscow
Russia
Alexander Il'in
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Lenin prospekt, 30
Tomsk
Russia
Keerti Kappagantula
Texas Tech University
Mechanical Engineering Department
Corner of 7th and Boston Ave.
Lubbock
TX 79409-1021
USA
Oksana V. Komova
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
Pr Akademika Lavrentieva 5
Novosibirsk
Russia
Larichev Mikhail Nikolaevich
V.L Talrose Institute for Energy Problems for Chemical Physics Russian Academy of Science
Leninsky prospect
bl 38/2:, 119334 Moscow
Russia
M. Lerner
Institute of Strength Physics and Material Science
Russian Academy of Science
8/2 Academicheskiy St.
Tomsk
Russia
Filippo Maggi
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Olga Nazarenko
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Lenin prospekt, 30
Tomsk
Russia
Olga V. Netskina
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
Pr Akademika Lavrentieva 5
Novosibirsk
Russia
Michelle Pantoya
Texas Tech University
Mechanical Engineering Department
Corner of 7th and Boston Ave.
Lubbock
TX 79409-1021
USA
Christian Paravan
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Julia Pautova
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Lenin prospekt, 30
Tomsk
Russia
Alice Reina
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
Mirko Schoenitz
University Heights
Otto H. York Department of Chemical, Biological, and Pharmaceutical Engineering
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Warren St
Newark
NJ, 07102-1982
USA
Valentina I. Simagina
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis SB RAS
Pr Akademika Lavrentieva 5
Novosibirsk
Russia
P.X. Song
Institute of Particle Science and Engineering
University of Leeds
Leeds, LS2 9JU UK National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy
Future Science & Technology Park
Changping District
Beijing 102209
China
Andrea Sossi
Dipartimento di Scienze e Tecnologie Aerospaziali, SPLab
Politecnico di Milano Campus Bovisa Sud
Via La Masa
I-20156 Milan
Italy
P. Storozhenko
State Research institute for Chemistry and Technology of Organoelement Compounds (GNIIChTEOS)
Shosse Entuziastov str., 38
Moscow
Russia
Ulrich Teipel
George Simon Ohm University of Applied Sciences
Processing Department
Wassertorstr 10
Nürnberg
Germany
Dmitry Tikhonov
Tomsk Polytechnic University
Lenin prospekt, 30
Tomsk
Russia
Dieter Vollath
Nano Consulting
Primelweg 3
D-76297 Stutensee
Germany
A. Vorozhtsov
Tomsk State University
Lenin str., 36
Tomsk
Russia
and
Institute of Problems of Chemical and Energetic Technologies
Russian Academy of Science
Socialisticheskaya str., 1
Byisk
Russia
Alfred P. Weber
Technical University of Clausthal
Institute of Particle Technology
Leibnizstrasse 19
D-38678 Clausthal-Zellerfeld
Germany
D.S. Wen
Institute of Particle Science and Engineering
University of Leeds
Leeds, LS2 9JU UK National Institute of Clean-and-Low-Carbon Energy
Future Science & Technology Park
Changping District
Beijing 102209
China
Stabilization of low-dimension structures, especially nanosized ones, and their use in the heterogeneous chemical reactions as nanopowders allow considering high specific surface as an independent thermodynamic parameter along with the temperature, pressure, concentration of reactants, and so on. New characteristics of 2D nanomaterials are well known – the thermal conductivity of graphene (5000 W (m K)−1) with 1000 m2 g−1 specific surface exceeds those for metals in a factor 10 [1]. The use of the advantages of high specific surface of 3D nanostructures – nanopowders in catalysis, oxidation, and combustion results in high rates of heterogeneous reactions and reduction in activation energies of ignition due to the small size of solid reactants. The laws of classical chemistry and physics are little applicable to the analysis of processes with metal nanopowders. An example of such a system is the burning of the composition nanoAl/nanoMoO3 at the rate of about 1 km s−1 [2].
In USSR, metal ultrafine (in fact, nano-) powders with reproducible properties were first obtained during World War II. In the 1960s and 1970s, numerous works were carried out on metal nanopowder production by electrical explosion of wires [3], evaporation-and-condensation method [4], and the technologies of metal nanopowder application for nuclear synthesis in the USSR and the US. In 1977, the result of these works was published in Morokhov's book [5], where the methods for metal nanopowder production by thermal decomposition of salts were viewed. In Western Europe and the US, the term nanocrystalline material appeared and spinned off after the Gleiter's publication in 1980 [6].
Since the discovery by Yu. Kondratyuk and F. Tsander in 1910 [7], the possibilities of powdery metal being used as an additive in energetic materials and as the reagents for self-propagating high-temperature synthesis [8] were intensively studied. Several books (e.g., the work of Pokhil et al. [9] and Sammerfield [10]) were published, where the laws of combustion of micron-sized metal powders (5÷500 μm) in high-temperature oxidizing environments were discussed. The study of the laws of combustion of powdered metals was done mainly for Al, Be, Mg, Ti, Zr, and B. The lack of micron-sized metal powders were detected during the first test of metallized fuels in the 1940s: an agglomeration of particles (especially for aluminum and magnesium) in the heating zone of energetic material, a low degree of metal reaction in the vapor phase (incomplete combustion), significant biphasic loss of a specific impulse (15% or more for the compositions containing 20–25 wt% Al) [9].
In the 1970s, Zeldovich and Leipunsky et al. [11] showed one of the approaches to reduce this lack by using low-sized metallic particles for fuels and combustion catalysts, in particular, metal nanopowders. This book summarizes the efforts of several teams over the world to realize those ideas.
The revitalization of the use of metal nanopowders in materials science and engineering became further possible in the 1990s, when the technologies for the large-scale production of those materials became available. Nowadays, tons of rather inexpensive metal nanopowders are produced in several countries for different technological applications, while the problems of their standardization, storage, handling, toxicity, correct application, and so on, are still unsolved.
The idea of this book is also to show the true picture of the properties of metal nanopowders and, correspondingly, their application avenues. The “romantic atmosphere” around nanomaterials and metal nanopowders accordingly should be left in the twentieth century forever. Nanoparticles and, especially, metal nanoparticles are very “capricious” technological raw materials with metastable physical and chemical properties in many cases, because nanometals (in addition to small particle size) show very high reducing properties: nanoCu react similarly to bulk Zn – release the hydrogen from acids, nanoAl show the properties of bulky alkali metals – react with water under room temperature, and so on.
Special scientific and engineering interests represent the new fundamental laws of combustion for the metal nanopowders, analysis of the combustion regimes, and intermediate and final burning products reported in this book. Excited by the experimental works of Ivanov and Tepper [12], scientists worked in the direction of nanometals application in energetic materials intensively during the past decade and the most valuable results are presented in this book.
In conclusion, we want to underline that the study of industrially available metal nanopowders allowed opening previously unknown laws and they will open the significant application prospects in science and technology of the twenty-first century.
Alexander GromovUlrich Teipel
1. Seol, J.H., Jo, I., Moore, A.L., Lindsay, L., Aitken, Z.H., Pettes, M.T., Li, X., Yao, Z., Huang, R., Broido, D., Mingo, N., Ruoff, R.S., and Shi, L. (2010) Two-dimensional phonon transport in supported graphene.
Science
,
328
(5975), 213–216.
2. Bockmon, B.S., Pantoya, M.L., Son, S.F., and Asay, B.W. (2003) Burn rate measurements in nanocomposite thermites. Proceedings of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Paper No. AIAA-2003-0241.
3. Chase, W.G. and Moore, H.K. (eds) (1962)
Exploding Wires
, Plenum Press, New York.
4. Gen, M.Ya. and Miller, A. (1981) A method of metal aerosols production. USSR Patent 814432. No. 11. p. 25.
5. Morokhov, I.D., Trusov, L.I., and Chizhik, S.P. (1977)
Ultradispersed Metal Medium
, Atomizdat, Moscow.
6. Gleiter, H. (1989) Nanocrystalline materials.
Prog. Mater. Sci.
,
33
(4), 223–315.
7. Gilzin, K.A. (1950) Rocket Engines, Moscow.
8. Merzhanov, A.G., Yukhvid, V.I., and Borovinskaya, I.P. (1980) Self-propagating high-temperature synthesis of cast refractory inorganic compounds.
Dokl. Akad. Nauk USSR
,
255
, 120.
9. Pokhil, P.F., Belyaev, A.F., Frolov, Y.V., Logachev, V.S., and Korotkov, A.I. (1972)
Combustion of Powdered Metals in Active Media
, Nauka, Moscow.
10. Sammerfield, M. (ed.) (1960)
Solid Propellant Rocket Research
, Academic Press, New York.
11. Zeldovich, Y.B., Leipunsky, O.I., and Librovich, V.B. (1975)
Theory of Non-Stationary Combustion of Powders
, Nauka, Moscow.
12. Ivanov, G.V. and Tepper, F. (1997) “Activated” aluminum as a stored energy source for propellants.
Int. J. Energetic Mater. Chem. Propul.
,
4
(1–6), 636–645.
Dieter Vollath and Franz Dieter Fischer
It is a well-accepted fact: the temperature of phase transformation is particle-size dependent. In general, this dependency is described as
In Equation 1.1, the quantities and stand for the transformation temperature of nanoparticles and the bulk material, respectively, d for the particle diameter, and α is a constant value depending on the entropy of transformation and the difference of the surface energy in both phases [1]. The same description, as proved for phase transformations, was found to be valid for the enthalpy of phase transformations. As typical examples, experimental results obtained for aluminum particles were given by Eckert [2], for tin particles by Lai et al. [3], or by Suresh and Mayo [4, 5] on yttrium-doped zirconia particles.
The range of particle sizes where Equation 1.1 is valid is limited. In the case of larger particles, Coombes [6] has shown that these have a surface layer of about 3 nm, where melting starts. As long as this surface layer dominates the behavior of the particles, Equation 1.1 cannot be applied. The existence of such a surface layer was also shown by Chang and Johnson [7] by theoretical considerations, concluding that this surface layer is less ordered than the center of the particles. As it was shown by Kaptay [8], the thickness of this premelting layer can be estimated by the rules of classical thermodynamics. Therefore, the assumption of a surface layer where melting starts is well justified. Now, one may ask if there is also a lower limit of particle sizes, below which Equation 1.1 is not applicable. Experimental results suggest this. Figure 1.1 displays the melting temperature of gold nanoparticles according to Castro et al. [9]. In this graph, the melting temperature is plotted versus the inverse particle size. According to Equation 1.1, one has to expect a linear relation.
Figure 1.1Experimental data for the melting temperature of gold nanoparticles, according to Castro et al. [9], together with linear fits plotted versus the inverse particle size. This graph shows clearly two separated ranges of the melting temperature: at larger particles, a range following Equation 1.1 (Range I) and a second range with particle-size-independent temperature (Range II).
The experimental data of Castro et al. may be separated into two ranges: Range I, which follows Equation 1.1 and a separated Range II, which is far off from the expected value. A linear fit of the experimental data in both ranges delivers an intersection at an inverse particle size of 0.62 nm−1, which is equivalent to a particle size of 1.6 nm. Obviously, for particle sizes below this intersection, Equation 1.1 is no longer valid. Such a phenomenon or similar ones are quite often described; as, for example, in the case of sodium particles [10]. Well in line with the above-described phenomenon, found for gold and sodium particles, are experimental results of Shvartsburg and Jarrold [11] on small tin particles consisting of 19–31 atoms, exhibiting melting points significantly higher than those of the bulk material. Besides a reduction of the melting temperature, close to melting or crystallization, additional phenomena are observed. Oshima and Takayanagi [12] found in 6 nm tin particles crystalline embryos with sizes around 1.5 nm. It is remarkable that this size is in the range of the limitation of Equation 1.1, as was found in the case of the melting of gold particles.
A general analysis of these phenomena needs detailed quantum mechanical studies. However, in most cases, one is interested in just a first approach using thermodynamic data of metallic nanoparticles. It is the aim of this chapter to show a simplified approach in this direction. The most important tool for any analysis of this kind is classical thermodynamics. Certainly, as this tool describes continuous systems, such an approximation cannot deliver phenomena depending on the quantum nature of the cohesion energy of small particles, or, in other words, magic particle sizes, superatoms, or jellium shell concepts cannot be expected as the result. These phenomena are excluded.
To analyze phase transformations, a detailed knowledge of the thermodynamic data of the materials in question is necessary. In addition, in the case of nanoparticles, knowledge of the surface energy in both phases is of great importance. As typical and well-studied examples for a phase transformation, melting, and crystallization were selected. In the following considerations, for reasons of simplicity, the minor changes of geometry and density are neglected. Generally, in the proximity of the melting point, the difference of the free enthalpy
at the temperature T are
The quantity is the enthalpy and the entropy of melting, both with the additional subscript “nano” or “bulk.” The term stands for the difference in the surface energy in the liquid and solid states. The quantity represents the surface area per mol of nanoparticles. It is important to note that the quantities in Equations 1.2 are the differences of the thermodynamic quantities observed during the melting process.
In the case of bulk materials, the surface energy term of Equation 1.2b is generally neglected but it is of relevance in the case of nanoparticles.
For lack of better data, in most cases, the material data of the bulk material and are used for nanoparticles, too, yielding
Setting leads to the well-known reduction in the melting point of nanoparticles in comparison with the one of the bulk material, , as was described for the first time more than a hundred years ago by Pawlow [13] using , , and neglecting for the bulk material, and more recently in [14–16] as
In Equation 1.5, M stands for the molecular weight and ρ for the density of the particles. To visualize the general trend in the reduction of the melting temperature with decreasing particle size, the use of the absolute value of the fraction is the only correct way in the case of melting and crystallization.
As already mentioned, the derivations leading to Equation 1.5 assume that it is allowed to use bulk data for nanomaterials: however, this is problematic in the case of nanoparticles. The following gives a series of indications.
In a review on the melting of solids, Mei and Lu [17] devote a whole chapter to abnormal size effects on melting. Most interesting in this context are experimental findings of Shvartsburg and Jarrold [11] reporting that tin clusters consisting of 19–31 atoms exhibit melting points significantly above that of the bulk material. Molecular dynamic (MD) simulations for clusters of Cn, Sin, Gen, and Snn clusters for by Lu et al. [18] also revealed melting points significantly above that of the bulk materials.
The material data of nanoparticles differ from those in bulk materials. For example, Vollath
et al
. [19] found drastic changes in the thermodynamic data of phase transformations in nanoparticulate zirconia, leading in the case of small particles to a change in the phase sequence with respect to temperature being reversed. An analogous phenomenon was found by Ushakov
et al
. [20] for pure and La-doped zirconia and hafnia nanoparticles with a diameter of 5–6 nm, where, at room temperature, the amorphous phase was more stable than the tetragonal one, in contrast to the general opinion that amorphous particles are the least stable ones.
Even more dramatic is the influence on surface energy. There are experimental indications for a six times larger surface energy for nanoparticles of gold [21] and silver [22] compared to the bulk values. However, the model leading to such an evaluation of these experiments is seriously questioned [23, 24]. An increase in the surface energy by a factor of roughly two for aluminum nanoparticles was predicted in a theoretical study by Medasani and Vasiliev [25]. Both results contradict theoretical estimates that find a reduction in the surface energy with decreasing particle size [23, 24].
To estimate the thermal behavior of nanoparticles, knowledge of thermodynamic quantities and surface energy is essential. Therefore, it is the goal of this contribution to present proper and reliable approaches to estimate the thermodynamics of nanoparticles based on bulk data.
For quite some time, there have been approaches to estimate the thermodynamic data of nanoparticles as a function of their size. Tolman [26, 27] presented such a relation for the surface energy as
The quantity is the so-called Tolman length. Das and Binder [28] generalized the Tolman relation to a wider applicable equation of type
In Equation 1.7, the quantity is again a characteristic length. However, Equation 1.7 was developed not for a free surface but an interface between two coexisting phases. A further relation, appraised as a “universal” relation, was reported by Guisbiers [29] in the form of
Guisbiers argues that this relation is valid for the material property , which may be the melting temperature, Debye temperature, superconducting temperature, Curie temperature, cohesive energy, activation energy of diffusion, or vacancy formation energy. The quantity is a material constant with the dimension of a length, and s is a positive number depending on the material property. For and Equation 1.6 and Equation 1.8 are practically equivalent. Furthermore, Equation 1.5 for the melting temperature obeys relation 1.8 with .
A more sophisticated relation for compared to Equation 1.8, based on the cohesive energy of nanocrystals, was reported by Lu and Jiang [23, 24] and Ouyang et al. [30], as
The quantity is the “smallest size” of d if this equation is valid. For , Equation 1.9a can be rewritten as
and as a further approximation as
Equation 1.9c agrees again with Equation 1.8 for .
A different physical approach was reported by Li [31], using a layer-by-layer structure of the reference crystal from which the nanoparticle is cut out. This concept leads to an extremely complicated relation, which yields for the same approximation as Equation 1.9c.
With respect to the melting point of nanomaterials , the thermodynamic approach of Letellier et al. [15, 16] should be noted. These authors have concluded the same tendency as shown in this chapter (Equation 1.5)
However, they introduce also as a conceptual extension a positive exponent s to the quantity as with being a reference quantity and c, a positive constant factor. They report a value of for lead nanoparticles and 1.20 for tin nanoparticles.
Safaei and Attarian Shandiz [32] published a model for the melting entropy of metallic nanoparticles, based on the methods of statistical physics. It is important to emphasize that their final formulae for the entropy of melting and the melting temperature confirm the earlier work by Jiang and Shi [33, 34], who developed, on the basis of Mott's equation for the melting entropy, a model for size-dependent melting temperature and entropy. Using an earlier approach to calculate the melting temperature of nanoparticles [35], Attarian Shandiz and Safaei [36] derived the same relations as Jiang and Shi [33, 34] for the melting temperature of metallic nanoparticles. The special feature of these derivations may be found in the fact that the final formulae depend on the thermodynamics and the crystal structure of the bulk material only. Furthermore, this approach inherently incorporates the influence of the surface energy. Therefore, this term no longer appears explicitly in the further equations.
Neglecting the electronic contribution, according to Attarian Shandiz and Safaei [32, 36], the ratio of melting temperatures is given by
In Equation 1.10, stands for a critical particle size, where the particle consists of surface atoms only. It is important to point out that, from its derivation, Equation 1.10 already contains the influence of the difference of the surface energy. From its definition, depends on the crystal structure of the particle. Attarian Shandiz and Safaei [36] give a table of this quantity for different lattices, for example, for the fcc structure , where δ stands for the diameter of one atom in the metallic environment. It is obvious that a table as in [36] for d0 is applicable only in exceptional cases where the structure of the smallest particle is identical to the bulk structure. This assumption is not necessarily correct; for example, for gold, see Tian et al. [37]. Therefore, in many cases, it may be necessary to fit the parameter d0 with experimental data. The quantity is the ratio of the coordination numbers at the surface, , and in the volume, , of the bulk material. For bulk materials and larger particles, is valid. Comparing calculated values with different results from the literature led Attarian Shandiz and Safaei [35, 36] to the conclusion that in the case of very small particles, a value is more appropriate. This finding is well in line with a study on coordination numbers as a function of particle size and structure by Montejano et al. [38]. Therefore, a fit function was developed, which gives for the bulk material a value 0.5 and which decreases to 0.25 for the particle size d0. Hence, it may be appropriate to select an expression such as
to fit experimental data of melting temperatures of nanoparticles. Equation 1.10 and Equation 1.11 contain the same and only one fit parameter d0. Obviously, d0 is the lower limit for d when this approximation may be applied. Certainly, this fitting process does not fulfill the claim of the original intention with respect to Equation 1.10, namely, to describe the melting properties of nanoparticles free of fitting parameters, depending on well-known bulk properties only. However, it will be shown later on in this contribution that the parameter d0 can be expressed by bulk values, making fitting processes unnecessary.
For the entropy and enthalpy of melting, Attarian Shandiz et al. [32, 35, 36] and Jiang et al. [33, 34] derived the following equation:
Equation 1.12a does not take into account the electronic contribution to the entropy of melting, for which Safaei and Attarian Shandiz [32] proposed the term
including the electronic contribution to the enthalpy of melting, described by the second term using the parameter . However, Safaei and Attarian Shandiz [32] pointed out that this term is zero in cases where the numbers of free electrons per ion in the solid and liquid phase are equal and not size dependent. According to Safaei and Attarian Shandiz [32], this may be correct in the case of metals, but certainly not for semiconductors.
The enthalpy of melting as a function of the particle size is given by
Equation 1.13 stems from the relation , valid both for the bulk and nanoparticles (see the additional subscripts “bulk” and “nano”); recall that is incorporated in the current version of .
From Equation 1.12 and Equation 1.13, the free enthalpy of melting is calculated as
Lastly, Equation 1.2b, containing the surface energy explicitly, and Equation 1.10, incorporating the surface energy, must lead to identical results. Therefore, these equations are well suited to calculate as a function of the particle diameter, yielding
and, consequently
This leads to as a function of d, using Equation 1.11, as
Certainly, one may criticize that this approach does not take care of the influence of the possible faceting of the surface, especially for the smallest particles. However, this may be justified in a first approximation and by the fact that, experimentally, faceting is rarely observed in the case of very small metallic particles.
Next, one may ask about the existence and size of stable nuclei for crystallization within the melted particles. To calculate the critical diameter of the stable nuclei, , one needs to determine the extremum of the free enthalpy of melting yielding
with as solution. (The lengthy derivation with its details is given in Appendix 1.A.)
Equation 1.16 leads to a transcendent expression; the roots can be found numerically only. Nuclei or particles with diameter d below are fluctuating; they develop and disappear. Nuclei or particles with larger diameter are stable; they do not fluctuate, and, if possible, have a tendency to grow (see also [39, 40]). Looking at the critical diameter as a function of temperature, one may expect the following cases:
: In this stable case, one may expect a crystallization process of the particles starting from the interior. This process was already assumed to describe experimental results at the melting point of nanosized lead particles [6]. Furthermore, in this case, one expects the formation and decay of nuclei, which has been proved experimentally [12].
: This is the unstable, fluctuating case. As the formation of nuclei is spontaneous, instantaneous melting or crystallization of the whole particle may be expected. Therefore, one has to expect perpetual fluctuations between the solid and the liquid state.
It is quite difficult to find reliable experimental or calculated data for the melting process of nanoparticles. In the first example, melting data of silver calculated by MD methods [41] were selected. Figure 1.2 shows the calculated and the fitted data by application of Equation 1.10 in connection with Equation 1.11. The fitting procedure led to a value of
Figure 1.2Melting temperature of silver nanoparticles. The MD data were taken from Luo et al. [41]. Fitting was performed using Equation 1.10 and Equation 1.11.
In the second example, experimental data for melting of tin nanoparticles obtained by Lai et al. [3] were fitted. As shown in Figure 1.3, in this case also, the fit is nearly perfect, resulting in the fitting parameter . In this figure, experimental data of Oshima and Takayanagi [12] were plotted as well, but not used in the fitting procedure. These data are of special interest because they split into two different paths at the particle size of about 5 nm. This phenomenon is better visible in Figure 1.4, where the data shown in Figure 1.3 are plotted versus the inverse particle size.
Figure 1.3 Melting temperature of tin nanoparticles. The experimental data used for fitting were taken from Lai et al. [3]. In addition, experimental data of Oshima and Takayanagi [12] are plotted. The inset shows, enlarged, the particle size–temperature range, where the experimental data are found. Fitting was performed using Equation 1.10 and Equation 1.11.
Figure 1.4Melting temperature of tin nanoparticles plotted versus the inverse particle size. In this graph, the same data as in Figure 1.2 were used [3, 12].
In Figure 1.4, in the field limited by the two different paths in the experimental data of Oshima and Takayanagi [12], liquid particles with crystallized inclusions can be observed in the electron micrographs. As the inclusions are unstable, this field was denominated as “pseudocrystalline.”
As a last example, the melting of gold nanoparticles is discussed. For gold, the experimental results of Castro et al. [9], which were already applied for demonstration in Section 1.1, are used. Figure 1.5 displays the melting data for gold nanoparticles, as discussed. For reasons of clarity, similar to Figure 1.4, the melting temperature of gold nanoparticles is plotted versus the inverse particle size.
Figure 1.5 Experimental and fitted data for the melting temperature of gold nanoparticles versus the inverse particle size. In this graph, experimental results of Castro et al. [9] and Dick et al. [42] are plotted. The results of these authors are different because Castro et al. used free and Dick et al. particles enclosed in silica.
Fitting of the experimental data for gold, denoted as Castro et al. I [9] in Figure 1.5, resulted in the fit parameter . In addition, the experimental results of Dick et al. [42] are plotted in this graph. Unfortunately, the experimental conditions of these two groups were so different that a common fitting is impossible. This is, because in the experiments of Dick et al. [42], the gold particles were mechanically confined in a silica matrix. Therefore, the experimental results of Dick et al. lead, in extrapolation, to a significantly higher melting temperature for the bulk material, . Interestingly, the value is practically identical in both experiments. Similar to the experimental results of Oshima and Takayanagi [12] for tin, the results obtained by Castro et al. [9] show, in the case of small particles (marked as Castro et al. II in Figure 1.5), a remarkable deviation from the fitted results.
Besides the data used earlier, there are more data obtained by MD simulations published in the literature. However, these data were not used because they predict melting points for the bulk material that are far off from the well-known ones.
Calculating the free enthalpy of melting as a function of temperature and particle size by application of Equation 1.14, with respect to Equation 1.10, Equation 1.11, and Equations 1.12 and , sheds more light on the melting behavior of metallic nanoparticles. On the basis of data calculated from the experimental results shown in Figure 1.1, Figure 1.2, Figure 1.3, Figure 1.4, and Figure 1.5, the diagrams in Figure 1.6a–c demonstrates the free enthalpy of melting for the examples explained. In the case of gold, the data obtained from the experiments by Castro et al. [9] were applied.
Figure 1.6 Free enthalpy of melting for (a) silver, (b) tin, and (c) gold versus particle size and temperature as parameter.
The graphs in Figure 1.6a–c have a few features in common: each of the curves shows two “zero-crossings” (roots with respect to Equation 1.14 using Equation 1.10 and Equation 1.11, one at a particle size showing a temperature-dependent root and the second a temperature-independent root.
The temperature-independent root is possible only if the condition
is fulfilled; for mathematical details, see Appendix 1.A. By combining Equation 1.10, Equation 1.11, and Equation 1.12, the condition in Equation 1.17 leads to the equation
with the abbreviation . Equation 1.18a, a quadratic one, has two roots; however, only the positive root is physically reasonable, which is denominated as the “characteristic particle size” and Equation (1.10) with Equation (1.11) as
This characteristic particle size is related to a characteristic temperature by combining Equation 1.12a with Equation 1.17 as
Table 1.1 displays the characteristic parameters evaluated for the three examples shown in Figure 1.6a–c.
Table 1.1Characteristic parameters calculated from the experimental data.
Metal and literature data used for fitting
d
0
(nm)
Equation 1.10
and
Equation 1.11
d
char
(nm)
Equation 1.18b
T
char
(K)
Equation 1.19
Ag [41]
1.76
607
Sn [4]
1.71
164
Au [9]
1.73
626
It is not too astonishing that the d0 values for gold and silver are nearly identical. More striking is the fact that dchar is nearly identical for the three metals in discussion.
Table 1.1 teaches that the characteristic particle size dchar is larger than d0, which is the smallest one, where these considerations are valid. In the interval of particle sizes between and , one may expect special phenomena, as the free enthalpy of melting (Figure 1.6a–c) changes sign at .
The graphs in Figure 1.6a–c exhibits the remarkable fact that, because of the change in the sign of the free enthalpy of melting, particles with sizes below dchar are liquid if their temperature is lower than Tchar and crystallized at higher temperatures.
Obviously, this is a case of reverse behavior of the phases, a rather strange phenomenon, which is quite often described. Very early, this phenomenon was predicted by Tammann [43]. Experimentally, the existence of this strange behavior was proved by findings of pressure-induced amorphization at constant temperature by Mishima et al. [44] for ice and by Hemley et al. [45] for silica. Crystallization at constant pressure with increasing temperature was found by Rastogi et al. [46, 47] for organic compounds. Recently, a theoretical basis for Tammann's generalized phase diagram was given by Stillinger and Debenetti [48] and Schupper and Shnerb [49].
With reference to the examples selected for this chapter, the phenomenon of reverse melting is better visible in a graph, where the free enthalpy of melting is plotted versus the temperature. Using silver as an example, this is shown for four different particle sizes in Figure 1.7, where the phenomenon of reverse melting and crystallization is perfectly visible. Particles with sizes of 1.5 nm are liquid at lower temperatures and solid at higher ones. In contrast, particles with 2 and 3 nm diameters behave in the usual way. In addition, the zero-valued, temperature-independent free enthalpy of melting for the characteristic particle size, 1.76 nm, is also plotted.
Figure 1.7 Free enthalpy of melting for silver particles versus temperature and particle size as parameter. Particles are solid in the case of positive values of the free enthalpy of melting and liquid in the case of negative values. Comparing the courses for the particle sizes, one realizes the reverse behavior of melting and crystallization for the particle size 1.5 nm.
From Figure 1.6a–c, one learns that at each temperature level, there are two particle sizes, where the solid and the liquid state are in equilibrium, . These equilibrium sizes, calculated by , according to Equation 1.14, are plotted in Figure 1.8a–c (See also Appendix 1.A.) for the three examples – silver, tin, and gold. In these graphs, the sizes of the nuclei, fulfilling Equation 1.16, are plotted, too. The graphs in Figure 1.8 show a few remarkable features. There is, as it is also visible in the earlier figures, one temperature-independent equilibrium particle size (Equilibrium 1), the “characteristic particle size,” dchar. The plot of the second temperature-dependent equilibrium particle size (Equilibrium 2) intersects the temperature independent equilibrium size at the “characteristic temperature.” The plot of the size of the stable nuclei , according to Equation 1.16, intersects at the same point; see the proof in Appendix 1.A. Obviously, dchar and are identical. The existence of the intersection of these three sizes at one point is a strong indication that this particle size characterizes the material.
Figure 1.8Equilibrium particle sizes (two roots with respect to Equation 1.14 using Equation 1.10) versus temperature for (a) silver, (b) tin, and (c) gold. In addition, the sizes of the stable nuclei (nucleus size) for crystallization according to Equation 1.16 are plotted. Note that these three curves have one point in common.
The consequences of the relative position of the sizes of the stable nuclei and the equilibrium particle sizes are obvious: At a particle size larger than the critical one, dchar, the size of the particles is larger than the size of the critical nuclei and the temperature-independent equilibrium particle size, which is smaller than the size of the critical nuclei . Therefore, at any temperature, these small particles repeatedly crystallize and melt. This is a continuing process of fluctuation, especially as these particles are smaller than the stable nuclei. Possibly, these nuclei are responsible for the crystallization process in melted metals. For a long time, these nuclei were postulated (see, e.g., [39, 40, 50]) and finally experimentally verified [51]. The situation is different for particle sizes smaller than . In this case, the size of the nuclei is larger than the one of the temperature-dependent equilibrium particles. Therefore, a priori, one cannot expect that these particles are stable, whereas particles with the characteristic particle size may be considered, with respect to their phase, as stable ones.
To analyze the stability of the particles against fluctuation, Figure 1.9a,b displays the free enthalpy of melting per particle as a function of the temperature for different particle sizes. In addition, the range where fluctuation is possible, limited by the lines (see, e.g., [52, 53]), is marked as shaded areas in Figure 1.9a,b.
Figure 1.9Free enthalpy of melting per particle for (a) silver and (b) gold versus particle size as parameter. Within the shaded area, limited by the thermal energy , fluctuation is possible.
Particles with size and temperature in this range may always alternate between the solid and the liquid state. Most interesting are the particles with the size dchar because for these particles the free enthalpy of melting is zero, independent of the temperature. Therefore, these particles are never stable: they always fluctuate between the two possible phases. Furthermore, looking at Figure 1.5, one realizes the strange phenomenon that melting of particles with sizes below 1 nm occurs at a constant temperature around 600 K. Analyzing Figure 1.6c and Figure 1.9b carefully makes it clear that for crystalline particles in this range of size and temperature inverse melting may be expected.
Equation 1.15c gives the difference in the surface energy between the solid and the liquid state for the bulk material and yields immediately for