Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences -  - ebook

Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences ebook

89,99 zł


This innovative book provides new perspectives on the globalization of knowledge and the notion of hegemonic sciences. Tying together contributions of authors from all across the world, it challenges existing theories of hegemonic sciences and sheds new light on how they have been and are being constructed. Examining more closely the notions of 'human rights' and 'individualization', this much-needed volume offers new and alternative ideas on how to transform the universalization of the Western model of science and can serve as an eye-opener for all those interested in non-hegemonic scientific discourse. This book is published within the Series 'Beyond the Social Sciences'.

Ebooka przeczytasz w aplikacjach Legimi lub dowolnej aplikacji obsługującej format:


Liczba stron: 431

 ibidem Press, Stuttgart


From the beginning of the 1990s onwards, irrespective of individual terminological preferences, we have been living in a new age of the world, namely "The Era of Globalization." Whether we take it positively or negatively, we have to acknowledge that the overwhelming wave of globalization in the fields of economics, politics, society, culture or whatever arena we take into consideration has been connecting every corner of the world and shrinking the globe.

At the same time, we also recognize that globalization has more often than not brought about and strengthened the power imbalance between"the center,"i.e. Euro-American developed countries, and"the peripheral,"i.e. mostly non-Euro-American developingcountries. That is why some opponents of globalization criticize it for being nothing more than "Americanization" or "McDonaldization." The field of social sciences is no exception to this criticism in that its theories, methods, presumptions, objectives, scopes have long been based on, (re)produced within, and dominated by Euro-American traditions.

Accordingly, those social scientists who are sensitive to undesirable situations in the present globalized world are strenuously addressing the issues of Euro-American-centric hegemonic social sciences. The World Social Sciences and Humanities Network (World SSH Net) is one of the most active networks of social scientists problematizing the hegemonic social sciences in the era of globalization. According to the mission statement articulated on its website (, the World SSH Net 1) aims to develop a world social sciences and humanities community, beyond the hegemonic patterns of Western science, 2) reflects on social phenomena worldwide, beyond the theoretical frameworks of nationally confined societies, and 3) promotes dialogue and cooperation between scholars from the social sciences and the humanities, beyond the boundaries of disciplines.

This book, Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences, represents one of the recent results of the World SSH Net's endeavors to materialize its mission. On 12/13 May 2012, the World SSH Network held a"thinkshop,"entitled"Theoriesabout and Strategies against Hegemonic Social Sciences," in Tokyo, which was co-sponsored by the Center for Glocal Studies, Seijo University, Japan, and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, Portugal. The papers presented at the thinkshop were elaborated afterwards by their respective contributors by incorporating the outcomes of the discussion and published in this book.

The Center for Glocal Studies (CGS) is a research center established just four years ago at Seijo University for 1) formulating and establishing a new research field,"glocal studies,"and 2) promoting this new field. Refining the concept of"glocalization," which was introduced by the British sociologist Roland Robertson in the middle of the 1990s, the center has tried to formulate "glocal studies" in order to shed light on hitherto inadequately examined socio-cultural dynamics within myriad "contact zones" between the "global and local," the "central and peripheral," and the "external and internal" realities of various different groupings and/or communities. In conducting glocal studies, the CGS focuses on developments that symmetrize what is thought of as an asymmetrical socio-cultural power balance between Euro-American and non-Euro-American nations. In this sense, the Center for Glocal Studies shares the same interests as the World SSH Net and the contributors to this book.

Since its establishment, the CGS has organized and held many symposiums, workshops and lectures on glocalization. Meanwhile, one of our colleagues, Prof. Shujiro Yazawa, and the president of the World SSH Net, Dr. Michael Kuhn, suggested to us that the center would be a co-sponsor of a thinkshop focusing on changing scientific concepts and paradigms in the era of globalization. As we share the same interests and views, the center wholeheartedly agreed and decided to co-sponsor the thinkshop as part of our research endeavors.

At the subsequently held thinkshop, 17 social scientists from Europe, Africa, South/East/Southeast Asia and Central America came together and presented their expertise and discussed theories about and the strategies against the hegemonic social sciences.At the thinkshop, I, as one of its participants sometimes witnessed heated debate over sensitive issues, such as the concept of human rights. The debate sometimes became so hot that short cooling-off breaks were needed. As a whole, however, the thinkshop effectively functioned as a "platform" for revealing less visible reflections on the world social science system.

I am confident that the accomplishments published in this present book represent a small but invaluable step forward for every social scientist willing to face up to one of the most irresolvable challenges in the era of globalization; developing theoriesabout and strategies against the hegemonic social sciences.

Professor Tomiyuki Uesugi


Center for Glocal Studies (CGS)

Seijo University

Table of Contents

Theories about "Globalization" and "Hegemonic Sciences"?
Philosophies and Ideologies of Globalization: Postmodernism, Postcolonialism and How to Go Beyond Them
"Hegemonic Science": Critique Strands, Counterstrategies, and Their Paradigmatic Premises
What is Hegemonic Science? Power in Scientific Activities in Social Sciences in International Contexts
Counter Strategies?
The Emergence of Hegemonic Social Sciences and Strategies of Non (counter) Hegemonic Social Sciences
The Transcendental Dimension in the Construction of the Universal Social Sciences
Three Decades of Chinese Indigenous Psychology: A Contribution to Overcoming the Hegemonic Structures of International Science?
Towards Internationalism: Beyond Colonial and Nationalist Sociologies
Who is the Social Scientist in the Twenty-First Century? Commentaries from Academic and Applied Contexts in the Mainstream and the Periphery
Making Social Knowledge One-Step Outside Modern Science: Some Cases of Social Knowledge-Making Strategies from Peripheries
Alternative Theories?
A Universal but "Nonhegemonic" Approach to Human Rights in International Politics: A Cosmopolitan Exploration for China
Individualization and Community Networks in East Asia: How to Deal with Global Difference in Social Science Theories?
Notes on the Contributors


This book is a publication of the project "Social Sciences in the Era of Globalization," conducted by KNOWWHY GLOBAL RESEARCH in collaboration with the World SSH Net, funded by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. The aim of this project is to engage a group of international and interdisciplinary scholars about the challenges the social sciences are facing in the era of globalization.

Since the publication of the Wallerstein Report in 1996, substantial changes in world conditions have dramatically altered the social sciences and the way social scientists view their discipline. These have affected the social sciences more than any paradigmatic shift of theories within a given approach to science ever could do. To mention only a few:

First, the transformation of the only real alternative society system, the project of socialism in the Soviet Union, later followed by China, into globally acting market economies, the very society model the Soviet Union, China, and their allies around the world had opposed for almost a century.

Second, together with the dissolution of this alterative society model, the abolishment of an alternative science system and of an alternative approach to social science thinking has transformed Historical Materialism, the set of theories fundamentally opposing the science model of capitalism and their representative democracies and its scientific interpretations of the world, into a mere variation of the multiplicity of relativized theories within the Western science system.

This, the transformation of the whole world into an arena for the competition for power between nation-states and using the growth of global capital to exploit this growth for their global political power, called"globalization,"has shifted the battle between antagonistic science approaches into a competition about theories within the Western model of science reflecting about a widely unified world—and into a "battle of cultures" with a newly emerging opposition. Overcoming the threat of a war between the two world society systems and the unification of the world under the regime of global capitalism has replaced the threat of a ‘hot' war between the two world powers by a world of wars.

Thirdly, probably based on the same Western model of science, the emergence of new science universes, have eroded the global scientific monopoly and theories, so far mainly created in Europe and the United States. It is evident that significant and powerful science arenas are emerging in countries like China, India, Brazil, South Africa, Korea, and Mexico. Namely, both the sciences in China and India are growing rapidly and have the potential to become global scientific superpowers.

Fourthly, and less visible than the changing scientific world power architecture, but certainly more significant in effect, are changes related to scientific concepts and paradigms that guide social thoughts. While Euro-American sciences have, to a greatextent, set the global scientific standards for the social and human science knowledge productions during the last century, the era of globalization created a space for developing new approaches to social science thinking, which question the monopoly of European paradigms and concepts. Academics in the former colonies of Europe, as well as in other newly created states, have started expressing their grievances about their work as being victims of "Western" scientific colonization that still colonizes their forms of thoughts and reflections. Social scientists that have had little or no colonial experience, likewise, complain about imposed knowledge concepts and agendas, and claim a new role in the globalizing scientific practices and discourses. Some Asian scholars entirely refuse to accept the Western knowledge concepts any longer, and propose "Islamic" or "Hindu" social sciences based on their indigenous religious-cultural backgrounds, incorporating an explicit opposition to Western knowledge paradigms. Academics in Africa experience a similar shift, divided between those who defend a catching-up strategy aiming at a deeper inclusion inside the existing science world and those who reject collaborations with Western-dominated sciences and defend a refuge into indigenist and nativist alternatives. Latin American scholars, who have had a longer history of defending a genuine "Latin-American" thinking, combine local knowledge with radical rereadings of Western scholarship to challenge the Western intellectual knowledge monopoly.

Aspiring for a nonhegemonic science world, the group of scholars gathered in this project, together with other invited colleagues who have participated in a series of three international thinkshops, reflect on the effects these changes in the world haveon the world's social science system and its ways of theorizing.

The first thinkshop took place in Tokyo in May 2012 under the title"Theories about and Strategies against Hegemonic Sciences."The second thinkshop will take place in Mexico City in February 2013 and focuses on"Multiple Epistemologies: Science and Space—Science and Culture—Science and Society." The third thinkshop will take place in Zwickau, Germany, in September 2014 and will focus on "The Global social science world : Beyond the ‘Western' universalism."

The outcomes of these reflections on all thinkshops will be published in a report with the working title"Social Sciences in the Era of Globalization."

This book with the title"Theories about and Strategies Against Hegemonic Social Sciences"is the first publication of the project group. It publishes the outcomes of the first thinkshop hold in Tokyo at the Seijo University, Center for Glocal Studies.

This book presents its findings in three sections. Section 1 offers thoughts about"Theories about Globalization"and"Hegemonic Sciences."With contributions from scholars from Europe, Africa, and East Asia, it discusses whether the existing theories ofhegemonic sciences allow us to understand how they were and are constructed and if the strategies implied in these theories are appropriate for building a nonhegemonic science world. Section 2, "Counter Strategies," presents thoughts from colleagues from East Asia (Korea and Japan), Europe, India, and Latin America. These deepen the debate from section 1 with alternative ideas about the challenges and ways of transforming the universalization of the Western model of science into nonhegemonic sciences. Section 3 contains two chapters, jointly written by colleagues from in East Asia (China and Korea), that invite the readers to consider alternatives ways of theorizing about the issues of human rights and individualization.

On behalf of the project group and all other thinkshop participants the editors of this book want to express their gratitude to Seijo University and the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. Saying this is not just a matter of politeness. International sciencecollaborations are, last but not least, also very costly. Without the engaged support of such innovative and creative foundations and universities, social science thinking would more and more drown in the circular reproduction of mainstream theorizing. We also want to thank Helen Jardine and Jack Rummel for editing the chapters, all written by nonnative English speakers, into proper American English.

Editors: Michael Kuhn and Shujiro Yazawa

Associate Editor: Kazumi Okamoto

Theories about"Globalization" and"Hegemonic Sciences"?

Philosophies and Ideologies ofGlobalization: Postmodernism,Postcolonialism andHow to GoBeyondThem

Léon-Marie Nkolo Ndjodo


Contributing to the profound changes in capitalism over the last forty years, a transformation into new radical forms mainly based on financialization and speculation, have been the French poststructuralists Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, Lyotard, Baudrillard, Bataille and Barthes, noted for their considerations on heterogeneity, fragmentation, chaos, fluidity, flexibility, frivolity, volatility, but also circulation and itinerancy. In response to the de-territorialization of capital and the development of its structures on a world-wide scale, these authors claim that the traditional social sciences have been incapable of giving a clear concept of man and society. They mainly stress the failure of these sciences to totalize the ideas of reason, objectivity, history and truth. Following that radical deconstruction of the so-called European "rationalist," "materialist" and "positivist" heritage with its great oppositions or dichotomies (knowledge/ignorance, truth/falsity, science/non-science, matter/spirit, civilized/barbarians, man/woman, center/periphery, master/slave, domination/resistance, hegemony/counter-hegemony), the poststructuralists proclaim the "end of modernity" and the rise of a new post-philosophical, post-historical, post-esthetic, post-humanist and post-ideological world. In their disciples Fukuyama, Vattimo, Bell, but also Rorty, the rejection of sense and reason in general is closely combined with the apology for irony, intuition, metaphor, symbols, images, religious thought and legends. How this project of deconstruction of modernity plays a coherent part in the consolidation of the power of global capitalism, with the ideological purpose to present as a natural necessity the contemporary developments of this authoritarian mode of production, is what we aim to explain. In this sense the apology for "peripheries," "subaltern social activities," "hybridism," "powers of minorities" perfectly accompanies and reinforces the hegemony of neo-capitalism. Our main work hypothesis is that there is a philosophy and an ideology that justifies contemporary and free-floating contemporary capitalism, and it has a name: postmodernism. Postcolonialism, obsessed by diasporas, exile, double consciousness, "identity" presented as "hybrid," is its replication in the Third World (Africa, Caribbean islands, Asia, Latin America). To give sense to our hypothesis, we make four observations.


The history of globalization is necessarily bound up with modern historyʼs bourgeois mode of production; consequently, globalization is the late age or logical result of capitalist development: the multinational age.

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!

Lesen Sie weiter in der vollständigen Ausgabe!